Today, I was re-checking some of my older census records to make sure that I have everyone linked correctly and that the record doesn’t split over two pages. I always count the number of people in a household and add that info at the top of my ‘added details’. Then I check to make sure that the number-of-linked-people matches this number. If not, I know that I didn’t merge someone for some reason or other. Once I get the number-of-linked people to match the number-of-people-in-household then I mark it as checked. Do I hear someone saying OCD much? Well, yes, probably, however, there are LOTS of times that this happens and it has helped me resolve numerous ‘relationship’ problems too. When does this happen? Census 1870 and below always have to be linked because they don’t have relationships listed at all. For Census 1880 and above that do have relationships, it happens when there is someone in the household that is a grandparent, cousin, in-law, or the relationship isn’t marked correctly on the census. These people must be merged manually and then linked with the household. It’s a fairly simple process if you go step-by-step. The video shows how I merged Bertha R Farnsworth back into her family on the 1930 Census. I’m still not sure how she got left out but that doesn’t really matter – the number-in-household now matches the number-linked. I also checked to make sure that the household didn’t split over two pages. I have another video on how to resolve that problem but will have to find the link. My database is a bit large so my apologies for the wait while loading the Source Index.